Not Everything is Healthy in Health Magazines

One of the so-called advantages of having an office like the Center for Holistic Health is the abundance of free magazines that are sent to us each month. When the magazine people call, they seem dumbfounded when I turn down a free subscription to Glamour or PC Gammer. However, I was pleasantly surprised to find a copy of Health Magazine in last weeks mail.

As I flipped through, I immediately noticed a number of prescription drug advertisements. Each of the eighteen ads had two full pages, one for the ad and one for the fine print. While the conditions to be treated varied, the possible side effects were quite comparable. The most common included headaches, depression, nausea, vomiting, musculoskeletal and joint pain, dizziness, respiratory tract infection, nerve system problems, immune problems, lupus like symptoms, blood problems, heart failure and of course, liver and kidney changes.

With a list like that, I might take my chances with the original symptom.

I suppose one could argue that the benefits out weigh the risks involved, or that the percentages of occurrences are relatively small. That’s an easy argument to make if you’re not the one. That’s also assuming the reported results from the drug manufacturer are accurate. Plus, these results are based on a particular amount of time. For example, the results may indicate that 5% of the people develop liver problems over a ten-week period. Who’s to say what that percentage will be at eleven weeks, or twenty weeks, or even a year? Who cares, right?

My uncle went to the doctor complaining of pain. He apparently had liver spots from having been on medications for quite some time. The doctor said, “Oh, that’s normal”. It may be that it’s the norm, but it’s certainly not normal and it doesn’t make it good.

I recently read an article from the Associated Press, discussing whether a particular diabetes drug should be “pulled,” in other words, taken off the market. The pharmaceutical company’s results contradicted an FDA advisory scientist’s report that called the drug unsafe. Who do you believe? I don’t know, but I’d have to seriously question any test result where there is a profit is at stake.

It’s important to note that most of the conditions treated with advertised drugs, and most health conditions in general, are lifestyle related. It stands to reason that there is a substantial enough cross section of “Health” readers with these conditions who will utilize the medications, and justify the cost of advertising.

I understand that advertising dollars are needed for any magazine to exist. It just seems ironic that a magazine titled “Health” would have so many advertisements that do not support the idea of health at all.

Someone may use a particular drug to achieve a desired change in his or her symptoms and there’s nothing inherently wrong with that. But the advertisements present the drugs as the solution. It would be unfortunate if the consumer remained unaware of the possibilities of increasing health rather than just treating symptoms.

In all fairness to the magazine, there were a number of articles and information directed toward improving one’s health. Talk about mixed messages, though. It’s sort of like having a “say no to drugs” sign on the medicine cabinet.

The Center for Holistic Health offers a number of holistic services, including Network Spinal Analysis, Somato-Respiratory Integration, Acupuncture, Massage, Reflexology and Nutrition, that encourage an integrated and empowered sense of well being and health to meet almost anyone’s need. Whether you’re trying to move though your symptoms or increase the quality of your life, consider becoming in charge of your own healing and find out how we can help.